Nato still short of troops for Afghan boostArchive
BRUSSELS: Nato countries have still not agreed how many extra troops they will send to Afghanistan to boost local forces in their fight against the resurgent Taliban, the alliance’s chief admitted on Thursday.
Nato this week announced it wanted to send around 3,000 extra troops to Afghanistan, bringing the Western military footprint up to about 16,000 soldiers to help the Afghans break the stalemate in the 16-year fight against the Taliban.
But after talks with the alliance’s 29 defence ministers in Brussels, Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg acknowledged there were still “gaps” in the roster that needed to be filled.
“We are now in the process of increasing the troop level,” Stoltenberg said.
“We haven’t finalised that so it’s not possible to provide any final figures when it comes to how much different countries are going to contribute.” The additional troops, most of them American, will help train and advise local Afghan forces who have struggled to hold Taliban and IS extremists at bay while suffering heavy casualties.
Washington has asked Nato allies to contribute 1,000 extra troops for Afghanistan to add to 2,800 US forces, but diplomatic sources say they may have to be content with just 700.
Stoltenberg said Nato had made progress but was still in the process of gathering troop commitments.
“We got some new announcements from some nations during the meeting today but we still have some gaps that we will continue to work on,” he said.
Nato leaders are optimistic that 2018 could see Afghan forces start to gain momentum against the Taliban, thanks to renewed training efforts, a growing air force and thousands of extra Afghan commandos.
Immediately following the summit, US Defence Secretary Jim Mattis hosted a separate meeting with partners from the coalition fighting the IS group in the Middle East, where the jihadists continue to lose territory.
Mattis said coalition partners are looking to the United States for a clear plan about what follows the physical defeat of IS.
“Maybe three-quarters of the questions I am getting asked now is (about) going forward. It’s not about are we going to be able to stop ISIS, are we going to be able to overcome ISIS. They are now saying: ‘What’s next? How is it looking?’” Mattis told reporters this week using another acronym for the group.
Following back-to-back losses, including of their Syrian and Iraqi strongholds of Raqa and Mosul, IS fighters are down to defending their last holdouts along the Euphrates River valley.
America’s military involvement in Syria has until now been focused solely on fighting IS, but with the jihadists on the ropes, Washington must articulate its longer-term interests and what role, if any, US forces will play in Syria.
A French source said allies were keen to hear what Mattis had to say about the role of Iran — a key supporter of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad — following Trump’s tough rhetoric against Tehran.
“We are wondering how the speeches by top US officials on the need to push back the Iranian presence in the region is going to manifest itself in real terms in the military strategy,” the source said.
Published in Dawn, November 10th, 2017