Coal scam case: Court to consider CBI's final reports on November 12
Coal scam case: Court to consider CBI's final reports on November 12
A Delhi court fixed November 12 for considering CBI's two final reports filed in a coal blocks allocation scam case.

New Delhi: A Delhi court fixed November 12 for considering CBI's two final reports filed in a coal blocks allocation scam case involving Navbharat Power Pvt Ltd (NPPL) and its officials.

Special CBI judge Bharat Parashar sought certain clarifications from the agency on its final reports in which it had filed charge sheet against NPPL, its Managing Director and Vice-Chairman Harish Chandra Prasad and Chairman P Trivikrama Prasad.

The agency had also filed a supplementary final report in the case saying no offence was found to have been committed by the public servants.

The Supreme Court-appointed special public prosecutor R S Cheema, however, had differed with the CBI giving clean chit to ex-coal secretary H C Gupta and two other serving public servants saying they had "illegally allocated" coal blocks to the firm.

Cheema had said that CBI's supplementary final report, giving clean chit to Gupta and public servants, was kind of a full charge sheet and if the court feels, it can take cognisance of the offences.

The charge sheet was filed against NPPL and its officials for offences under sections 120-B (criminal conspiracy) read with 420 (cheating) of IPC for allegedly misrepresenting facts, including inflated net worth, to acquire coal blocks in Rampia and Dip Side of Rampia in Odisha.

CBI had earlier alleged that the net worth of the firm applying for coal blocks was an important factor to determine its financial strength and NPPL had fraudulently claimed in its application that it was supported by Globeleq Singapore Pvt Ltd, Navbharat Ventures Ltd and Mahalaxmi Group Ltd.

NPPL and its officials were named as accused by the agency for allegedly conspiring and cheating by misrepresenting facts to "embellish" its applications to get allotments between 2006 and 2009.

The FIR in the case was lodged after a preliminary enquiry was initiated by CBI on a reference by CVC.

What's your reaction?

Comments

https://hapka.info/assets/images/user-avatar-s.jpg

0 comment

Write the first comment for this!