'Won't Breach Secularism': Supreme Court Stays Allahabad HC Order Declaring UP Madrassa Law 'Unconstitutional'
'Won't Breach Secularism': Supreme Court Stays Allahabad HC Order Declaring UP Madrassa Law 'Unconstitutional'
The Supreme Court bench said that the object and purpose of Madrassa board is regulatory in nature and the Allahabad high court is 'not prima facie correct that establishment of board will breach secularism'.

The Supreme Court on Friday put an interim stay on an order of the Allahabad High Court that declared the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004, “unconstitutional” and violative of the principle of secularism.

A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud issued notices to the Centre, Uttar Pradesh government and others over the pleas against the high court order and directed them to file their responses by May 31.

The court then posted the matter to the second week of July.

“The object and purpose of Madarsa board is regulatory in nature and the Allahabad HC is not prima facie correct that establishment of board will breach secularism,” the bench, also comprising Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, said. The top court said HC has misconstrued provisions of the 2004 act as it does not provide for religious instruction and the purpose and character of the statute is regulatory.

Responding to the development, Uttar Pradesh Minister Danish Azad said, “We all will study the decision of the SC. And whatever guidelines we have received for Madarsa education, we will definitely try to work on them. 2017 onwards, our government has taken good steps for Madarsa education, to make it better in every way. We have worked to mainstream the students of a madarsa.”

The high court on March 22 declared the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004, “unconstitutional” and violative of the principle of secularism, and asked the state government to accommodate current students in the formal schooling system. The high court had declared the law ultra vires on a writ petition filed by advocate Anshuman Singh Rathore.

The petitioner had challenged the constitutionality of the UP Madarsa Board as well as objected to the management of madarsa by the Minority Welfare Department, rather than the education department.

(With PTI inputs)

What's your reaction?

Comments

https://hapka.info/assets/images/user-avatar-s.jpg

0 comment

Write the first comment for this!