Vermont AG sides with defendants in drug case near border
Vermont AG sides with defendants in drug case near border
The Vermont Attorney General is siding with defendants in a drug case whose vehicle was searched by federal agents near the Canadian border and are now being prosecuted in state court.

MONTPELIER, Vt. The Vermont Attorney General is siding with defendants in a drug case whose vehicle was searched by federal agents near the Canadian border and are now being prosecuted in state court.

In a brief filed with the Vermont Supreme Court, Attorney General T.J. Donovan argues the couple’s car was searched without probable cause under state law, in violation of the Vermont Constitution. The search was legal under federal law.

Vermonters are entitled to the full protections under the Vermont Constitution, regardless of which law enforcement agency is involved, said Donovan in the brief filed in support of the defendants. Federal government involvement does not diminish or erode the protections afforded to Vermonters under the Vermont Constitution.

The case began in August 2018 when two Vermont residents, Philip Walker-Brazie and Brandi Lena-Butterfield, were returning to their home in the border community of Richford when they were stopped by U.S. Border Patrol agents.

The agents searched the car without the consent of the defendants or a warrant, as allowed under federal law, when they allegedly discovered illegal drugs. They called the Vermont State Police. The couple is now being prosecuted for drug possession in state court.

Under Vermont law, police police need to obtain a warrant based on probable cause before searching a vehicle without the drivers consent, Donovan said.

Walker-Brazie and Lena-Butterfield are asking the court to suppress the evidence on the grounds the federal agents lacked reasonable suspicion to stop the car under state law and that Article 11 of the Vermont Constitution requires that the evidence be suppressed.

Orleans County States Attorney Jennifer Barrett did not reply to an emailed request for comment.

Michael McCarthy, a spokesperson for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, said the agency does not comment on ongoing litigation.

The Superior Court judge refused to suppress the evidence and the defendants appealed to the state Supreme Court.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

What's your reaction?

Comments

https://hapka.info/assets/images/user-avatar-s.jpg

0 comment

Write the first comment for this!