views
Gujarat Titans captain Hardik Pandya has garnered severe backlash owing to his experimental move to send debutant spinner Noor Ahmad to bowl the final over of the big-ticket IPL encounter against Rajasthan Royals on April 16. The out-of-the-box decision backfired as Noor failed to defend 7 runs with Shimron Hetmyer securing the victory in just two balls.
Following Rajasthan’s comfortable 3-wicket win, fans lashed out at Pandya and the Gujarat team management for not utilising Mohit Sharma in the death overs. The pacer conceded just 7 runs in the first two overs of his four-over spell. Some also brought out the reference to MS Dhoni, saying that Pandya was probably trying to set an example of strange captaincy like the former Indian skipper.
IPL 2023: Orange Cap Complete List of Batters with Most Runs, Check here
A fan could not believe Hardik Pandya’s decision to “go with other bowlers instead of Mohit Sharma, who was clearly their standout bowler today."
I'm curious about Hardik Pandya's decision to go with other bowlers instead of Mohit Sharma, who was clearly their standout bowler today. No matter what angle you approach it from, this decision cannot be defended.— Shivani Shukla (@iShivani_Shukla) April 16, 2023
While venting out frustration about Hardik Pandya’s captaincy, another fan mentioned Rajasthan skipper Sanju Samson as “the perfect successor of MS Dhoni."
Not Virat Kohli, Not Rohit Sharma, Not Hardik Pandya. Sanju Samson is the perfect successor of MS Dhoni. Agree or die. #IPL2023 #GTvRR pic.twitter.com/SWRFcLwJRI— Ghibli???? (@Goonermessii) April 16, 2023
Another user pointed at Hardik Pandya’s below-par performance, wondering if captaincy was the reason behind the lean patch.
Hardik pandya’s performance after becoming captain pic.twitter.com/lKP0nSypaL— Ansh Shah (@asmemesss) April 16, 2023
IPL 2023 Points Table: Check Team Standings, Team Points, Wins, Losses & Orange Cap, Purple Cap
A fan did not spare Gujarat Titans head coach Ashish Nehra, referring to Hardik Pandya’s blunder.
Ashish Nehra and Hardik pandya before selecting a spinner to bowl the last over when fast bowlers are available. pic.twitter.com/wZYdR97elp— EngiNerd. (@mainbhiengineer) April 16, 2023
Here are some other reactions:
Hetmyer is just an Underrated finisher of IPLBad Captaincy by hardik pandya
— Almighty ???????????????????? (@Almight788) April 16, 2023
Attitude – Virat Kohli levelPerformance – Dinda level This is hardik Pandya for you, this guy literally thinks that he is better than Virat and dhoni. pic.twitter.com/eC9TRh7I2k
— KT (@IconicRcb) April 16, 2023
We might not Troll Hardik Pandya, if Noor would have defended that 7 Runs in Last over.But still that was Strange captaincy. Mohit Sharma just conceded 7 Runs in his 2 overs of entire match. Still Pandya given last over to Debutant Noor.
Dhoni ek hi hai bhai????#GTvRR #RRvsGT pic.twitter.com/ml3I6FUi8m
— Govind Mishra (@Mishrii0605) April 16, 2023
IPL 2023: Purple Cap Complete List of Batters with Most Runs, Check here
In reply to Gujarat’s 178-run target, Rajasthan pulled off a disastrous start to the chase, losing both of their openers in the first three overs. Devdutt Padikkal and Sanju Samson then initiated the rescue operation before Mohit Sharma dismissed Padikkal for 26. Samson continued to steer the innings quite composedly till Shimron Hetmyer joined hands with him and began accelerating the innings.
After the skipper returned with a 23-ball 60, Hetmyer came out of his shell and showed off his finishing prowess. The Caribbean big-hitter smashed five sixes and two boundaries during his 26-ball innings and in the end, remained unbeaten at 56. Dhruv Jurel and Ravichandran Ashwin played some blistering cameos and scored 18 and 10 runs.
Picking up the commanding win, Rajasthan Royals retained their position at the top of the IPL table. The Pink franchise has endured a single loss in their 5 appearances. Meanwhile, the Titans remained in the third spot with 6 points in the same number of games.
Get the latest Cricket News, IPL 2023 Live Score, Orange Cap and Purple Cap holder details here
Comments
0 comment